+61 3 9272 5644

Home
About
News
- News and Views
- Official Statements
Events
Departments
Contact Us

Home
About
News
- News and Views
- Official Statements
Events
Departments
Contact Us

December 17, 2020

December Opinion Piece

By Dr. Ron Weiser AM Although it is Chanukah, it very much seems as if we are witnessing a Purim spiel in two arenas. Having... Read More

RECENT NEWS

ZFA statement on PJCIS recommendation to proscribe all of Hamas

ZFA welcomes PM Morrison’s announcement about IHRA

Statement on John Lyons’ new book

The Abraham Accords’ legacy is a new Arab pragmatism

Education minister calls on government and universities to adopt the IHRA working definition of antisemitism

MORE NEWS

News
Events
ZFA News
Israel News
Affiliate News
ZFA Newsletters

Contact Us

Phone : +61 3 9272 5644

Email : zfa@zfa.com.au

Address : 306 Hawthorn Rd Caulfield South VIC 3162

FACEBOOK FEED

Zionist Federation of Australia

2 days ago

An important read by Dr. Andre Oboler from The Australian Jewish News on the adoption of the IHRA working definition of antisemitism and what it means in the Australian context. He also explores why, in his view, objections to the adoption are misguided. He writes, "our community always has a diversity of opinion, and this is no exception. A few small Jewish groups oppose the adoption of the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism. What frustrates me is that their objections are based on misunderstandings, or efforts to parrot what people overseas say, without considering the Australian context.In the United States, for example, the ability to engage in hate speech, including antisemitic hate speech, is protected by the First Amendment. Efforts to impose sanctions for antisemitic hate speech break with the society’s cultural norms. One can understand why people like Kenneth Stern raised concerns about such norm breaking government intervention. In the Australian context where racism is unlawful, and universities have long had codes of behaviour, a definition doesn’t challenge societal norms, it clarifies their application.Australia, like most countries that adopted the definition, is unlikely to create new laws. Instead, we will recommend the definition to decision makers as a tool to help them examine the facts of an incident and reach a conclusion on whether it should be classed as antisemitic. Existing policies, rules, or laws would then come into play, as they always have, but with more consistent application." Read on below. ... See MoreSee Less

Objections to IHRA definition are misguided

www.australianjewishnews.com

'In the Australian context where racism is unlawful, and universities have long had codes of behaviour, a definition doesn’t challenge societal norms, it clarifies their application.'

View on Facebook

· Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email

FOLLOW

Subscribe to our mailing list

Sign up for ZFA news, events and commentary

Leave this field empty if you're human:

Copyright © 2021 Zionist Federation of Australia. All Rights Reserved.

Website by Novi